Huh? The usual pattern is that experiments belong to a user and then they graduate to having their own org iff they grow enough maintainers for that to make sense. How is that toxic or self-centered? It's just like "here's a place to do low-stakes experiments in public view". It's not particularly about ego or selfishness or whatever.

▲

Lammy 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

“Organizations” didn't exist until GitHub was already popular and entrenched, and it got popular and entrenched by centering the person developing the code instead of the code that was being developed: https://github.blog/news-insights/introducing-organizations/

And they weren't free until 2020: https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/learning-about-github...

▲

psychoslave 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

▲

estimator7292 10 hours ago | parent [-]

You are being a toxic asshole right now by accusing people of being sociopaths completely unprompted.

Honestly, pretty sociopathic behavior right here.

▲

psychoslave 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

[flagged]

▲

JumpCrisscross 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> exposing

You’re not exposing any new ideas. You’re just attacking.

	▲	psychoslave 36 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Not attacking any individual at least. Attacking in the sense of being critical of individualism as a louded ideology, and connecting technical artifacts to some form of individualism and likely outcome, yes definitely. There is no need to pretend for novelty in such a critic, indeed. Just because we don't reinvent it on the fly doesn't make the use of arithmetic worthless.

▲

buildsjets 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]