Why do you feel the OpenCode harness is better than the Claude code one? Just curious what you feel it is doing better?

OpenCode harness is so good I'm surprised one of the big players hasn't bought them outright. Essentially their harness:

* Removes all the system prompt cruft and bullshit that CC pumps into the prompt and pollutes context and shit like "adaptive thinking"

* Is extremely good at keeping the model aligned with AGENTS.MD and opencode.json and using all the features available there (parallel agents, sub-sub agents, etc)

For example, I'm working on a repo with 5 distinct components and I have a specialized agent for each component. CLAUDE.MD is just a markdown file where I say "Hey Claude always use X agent for X component. X agent has this prompt blah blah" and then pray Claude remembers to use it. opencode.json is a structured file used by the harness and it has ALWAYS coerced the model to use it, including being able for the agents to delegate subagents in parallel etc.

This makes a massive difference. So if I have a feature that touches multiple components, OpenCode rips through it with the specialized subagents while Claude sits their spinning its wheels and occasionally remembering theres a specialized agent and then maybe once in a blue moon it will do it in parallel.

With CC I feel like I need to do all these invocations and coercions. OpenCode, once you've got your opencode.json and agents defined, just works.