Remix.run Logo
briffle 6 hours ago

I looked at taking the train from my town to Glacier National Park along with my bike. The route goes from Portland and Seattle to Chicago, and has a stop at south glacier.

Step 1, get to the local train station in my town. There are 6 trains daily between me and Portland. Also, amtrak on the cross country trains requires the bikes to be in a box, in storage cars.

So I gotta get a large bike box, and get myself, my bike, the box, and some tools to break it down to our local amtrak station. Then partially dissasemble the bike, and box it. (of course, our train station has room in it for 5-10 people, and most sit outside, uncovered, which is fun in spring.)

Then, get to the main Portland Train station, with my bike box, and backpack with my stuff and tools. Wait up to 9 hours for the hawaitha train. (its often many hours late, and only leaves once per day).

Load Bike in cargo car, and then board train late at night.

Wake up around 5am, (or later, if train is behind schedule) and disembark at Glacier, re-assemble my bike. Figure out how to get it, and the box (i'll need it for the return trip) to a hotel or AirBnB.

For the return trip, its about the same, 1 daily westbound train, that is usually hours late, then hope you get to portland before the last train for the day leaves for my town, or else find a place to stay with a bike, backpack, and bike box in the sketchy area around the trainstation...

Or, hop in a car with a bike rack, and drive 10 hours. Which is easier, and MUCH cheaper if I split the cost of gas with someone else. So 2 extra travel days back for vacation, and much less stress.

NoGravitas 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Most of this is just that the US rail system is amazingly shitty by global standards.

davidgay 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is an extremely simplistic view. For instance, the US moves more of its freight (by percentage) than all western European countries except Switzerland: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_rail_usag...

troupo 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Passengers are not freight. And freight is one of the reasons US railways suck for passengers.

xnx 39 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Moving people by train in the US makes about as much sense as delivering pizzas by barge.

Der_Einzige an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Freight is better. Passengers don’t belong on trains.

llbbdd 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The US is a very big, very spread out place. I'm not sure which country has trains that take you directly to your front door.

ssl-3 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It is indeed a very big place.

But this fellah seemed to have that part figured out: Bike to the train station, and take the bike on the train. That part seems straight-forward. The train stations were near-enough to where they wanted to start, and near-enough to where they wanted to be.

The problems they lament seem to revolve chiefly around the specifics of taking the bike on a train, and the limited schedule of the train, and the lack of adhesion to that schedule.

Those problems wouldn't be improved if the vastness of the US were reduced, would they?

mixmastamyk 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Recently, on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47815395

troupo 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There are lots of potential high-traffic corridors, and the US is still incapable of serving them.

xnx 37 minutes ago | parent [-]

Hard to find an unserved corridor where train makes more sense than plane or car.