| ▲ | WadeGrimridge 10 hours ago |
| Mitchell on what he'd do if he was in charge of GitHub: https://x.com/mitchellh/status/2036866220449030168 |
|
| ▲ | latexr 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| https://xcancel.com/mitchellh/status/2036866220449030168 |
| |
| ▲ | cedws 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I was expecting something more pragmatic than 'lean into AI even harder' to be honest. GitHub needs to slow down with the AI shit and spend manpower fixing what's broken. Actions is a complete fucking disaster. Also I have no idea what Pierre is but their website is horrible. | |
| ▲ | CamperBob2 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The big idea is all agentic interactions should critically rely on GitHub APIs. Code review should be agentic but the labs should be building that into GH (not bolted in through GHA like today, real first class platform primitives). GH should absolutely launch an agent chat primitive, agent mailboxes are obviously good. Etc. GH should be a platform and not an agent itself. Why do I want that running on somebody else's computer? It's bad enough that most developers already rely on Anthropic or OpenAI. What value does a remote working repo add? | | |
| ▲ | sho_hn 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | This sounds like massive centralization on GitHub and super ugly product coupling, instead of rolling open standards. I'm now glad Mitchell doesn't run GitHub. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | hocuspocus 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Copilot revenue goes to 0 if GitHub burns to the ground. That's not remotely true. I doubt most Copilot Business/Enterprise subscribers care about GitHub at all. |
|
| ▲ | dragonelite 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Inbe4 he will move to some agentic git product from vercel |
