| ▲ | varun_ch 10 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
I don’t know if it’s production ready yet, but tangled.org is a really interesting take on a forge and I’ve been watching it for a while. It decentralizes the centralized parts of GitHub in a pretty neat way. The biggest problem with forges that aren’t GitHub is people need to make and manage all these different accounts for each place they contribute (which almost certainly will lower the amount of people who do. Maybe this is a good thing these days though...) Tangled uses the identity stuff from atproto which lets the important stuff (git, CI, etc) be decentralized while people only need one identity to contribute (and you can self host your PDS too). So nothing ends up being reliant on a third party. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | vvill 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I'm also closely following Tangled's development. Their two biggest weak points: lack of private repositories and ux design (which I don't have a problem with but I've seen many people mention) are both being worked on. Atproto is developing a permissioned data segment to the protocol, and Tangled just hired a designer. I'm excited for it. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cedws 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
>manage all these different accounts for each place they contribute For me that's a minor problem. The struggle of working across multiple code forges or making my code available on multiple is syncing CI/CD, issues, releases between them. I don't have the energy to maintain multiple versions of a pipeline. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | charcircuit 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
But a tangled account doesn't solve the problem of needing an account on those other forges. You just added one more account someone needs to make. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||