> a view point largely supported
No, you're playing a rhetorical game, trying to con readers with a switcheroo between pairs of "viewpoints" that aren't actually the same thing at all. For example:
1. "The liberals are everywhere trying to teach our children something wrong! They're telling them men can become pregnant!"
2. "Men--by which I implicitly mean people without the parts for it--cannot become pregnant."
Only the second one common and banal, unless you ask someone with a weird fetish, or perhaps a fan of Schwarzenegger and Danny Devito eager to talk about the film Junior.
In contrast, the first one is not solely a medical belief, but also a claim about what others advocate, and the average American--or average HN commenter--may quite rightly judge you a weirdo for internalizing and repeating it.
