> entirely driven by price

I might buy that argument if Azure compensated for its awful availability and security with lower prices.

But the kind of person who buys Azure is the kind of person who buys Windows and Teams, perfectly happy to pay a premium for all the extra abuse.

▲

bmitc a day ago | parent [-]

It's curious how bad people say Azure is. I've never used it, but I've used AWS, and AWS is a gigantic mess. So that makes me concerned if Azure is worse than a gigantic mass.

▲

solatic a day ago | parent | next [-]

Azure's management APIs break connections coming from outside Azure's network every time they use DNS to execute a blue/green swap on their public load balancers. Existing connections are not gracefully drained. Terraform state gets corrupted (it thinks the operation failed when it actually succeeded and the resource was actually created) and requires manual fixing.

This happened frequently enough at large enough scale we seriously considered building an automation to attempt to analyze the Terraform logs for the connection breaking and automatically import the created resource.

Azure support was completely worthless.

	▲	tacticus 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Azure support was completely worthless. It's quite incredible that a support bill in the >10k per month range from azure makes the public google (not even GCP with a support contract) support look not crap

▲

murkt a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Azure is worse. These series of posts were posted here not that long ago https://isolveproblems.substack.com/p/how-microsoft-vaporize...

▲

skywhopper a day ago | parent | prev [-]

AWS is a complex mess, but it’s pretty good at delivering its services reliably. Azure is a mess that is also unreliable.