Remix.run Logo
giancarlostoro 2 days ago

I do wonder if in 100 or 200 years if we do become interplanetary as a species, and technology advances if many of these satellites will just disappear from the night sky and it would be long since forgotten or if remembered only as a steppingstone towards an interplanetary future.

In the meantime, Starlink is the only thing that gives my sister in Puerto Rico access to the internet when the grid gets completely nerfed by a hurriance so she can tell us she's alright, well, that and landlines if she gets a power generator, otherwise, we're left to wonder how my sister and nephews are doing.

2 days ago | parent | next [-]
[deleted]
AntiUSAbah 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

You don't need starlink to get a message out of Puerto Rico.

We also don't need starlink as a stepping stone.

What we need is food for the planet, resiliance infrastructure, proper health care, stable energy grids.

giancarlostoro 2 days ago | parent [-]

I sure hope you never have to wonder if your relatives are safe and doing well after they have no way to communicate with you for weeks.

AntiUSAbah a day ago | parent [-]

1. to keep this argument properly, you still need to see what the overall benefit for the whole society is and not just your little bubble. And putting a lot of satelites in sky, affects 8 billion people.

2. As i said, robust infrastructure would fix that too. Fiber under earth, backup energy etc.