Remix.run Logo
semiquaver 6 hours ago

He’s hitched his wagon to a thesis and views everything through that lens come hell or high water.

  > he does not consider, even to disagree with it, the possibility that the industry is paying for Anthropic’s product for non-psychosis reasons, such as finding it useful)
This is my main problem with Zitron. He is so obviously the epitome of motivated reasoning. He seems constitutionally incapable of admitting the possibility that companies derive usefulness and productivity from LLMs. For anyone capable of doing on the ground reporting this would be trivially obvious (at least when it comes to coding). So he ends up just cheerleading on the “AI bad” side whether the cheers make any sense or not.

  > “Nobody wants to talk about the fact that AI isn’t actually doing very much,” he complained, before going on to complain about people saying that agents are able to do tasks independently with oversight. “What tasks, exactly? Who knows!” he wrote.
  >
  > Ed, thousands of people know and it is your journalistic responsibility to be one of them!
He’s intentionally incurious and doesn’t understand the idea of a general-purpose technology. This would be like looking at the rise of programming and computers in the 80s and 90s and asking “what are computer programs doing? I don’t see any concrete benefits right now, must be a scam”
JPLeRouzic 5 hours ago | parent [-]

> This would be like looking at the rise of programming and computers in the 80s and 90s and asking “what are computer programs doing? I don’t see any concrete benefits right now, must be a scam”

There were many people around me that said that in the 80s.