As I recall, it was Saudi Arabia that largely bank rolled Pakistan's "not party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty" weapons program [Ω](?) .

[Ω] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan_and_weapons_of_mass_d...

So there's that.

▲

quietbritishjim 19 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> ... bank rolled Pakistan's not party to ...

They bank rolled Pakistan's not party to the treaty? Sorry I can't parse this sentence.

Did you munge two sentences i.e. Saudi Arabia bankrolled Pakistan's nuclear weapons, and also Pakistan is not party to the treaty?

▲

defrost 19 hours ago | parent [-]

My bad, it's late in the evening here and I typed something that works when spoken with emphasis and timing (at least in my head).

I added quotes, it should say that Pakistan's weapons program is one that is outside the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as Pakistan is not a party to it.

▲

ameen 3 hours ago | parent [-]

We all know Israel isn’t party to it either.

	▲	defrost 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Nor India, nor South Sudan. North Korea was, but didn't comply and then went backsies. Of the four never did non signatories, South Sudan is not like the others (wrt one metric at least).

▲

21asdffdsa12 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

We all live in a yellow cake submarine..

Its a pakistani submarine, with exclusive saudi-royalty members on the bridge.

We should build a city that is a statistical bunker- basically a line, for the edge case of jihadist insurgents getting the forbidden eggs in the cake.

	▲	2ndorderthought 13 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Oh like mark Zuckerberg 30th through 40th mansions?