> . We should put a radio telescope on the far side of the moon [0] to benefit from the thousands of kilometers of lunar material separating Earth's emissions from telescopes.

Do you really think a starlink style installation won't be put in orbit of the moon before such a telescope could be funded?

▲

adev_ 2 days ago | parent [-]

> Do you really think a starlink style installation won't be put in orbit of the moon before such a telescope could be funded?

There are ITUs rules that forbid that and the far side of the moon is declared as radio quiet.

▲

bluGill 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Those rules won't last long once (IF) there are significant numbers of people on the moon. The rules are easy to agree to today (50 years ago) because nobody could do anything otherwise anyway. Once the rules are getting in the way of a significant number of people they will change.

I make no predictions how they will change, but the current rules are obviously unworkable if significant numbers of people live in space. I also make no predictions on if we will ever get significant numbers of people living in space - there are a lot of hard/expensive problems that may not be solvable.

	▲	adev_ 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		> Those rules won't last long once (IF) there are significant numbers of people on the moon. Maybe. If you believe we are heading to a situation with large numbers of colonies on the moon. For now we are no way there and already struggle to just get back there.

▲

SiempreViernes 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Starlinks are already spewing out into supposedly protected radio bands on Earth, good look getting these rules respected on the Moon when they aren't here.