No less than self hosted, imo. If youre on some cloud it doesnt really matter that you pay them absurd amounts of money, you arent sovereign.

▲

beernet 16 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

So if a company self hosts their physical infrastructure which will burn down once a fire sets in, they are more "sovereign" than a company running on a redundant cloud? I definitely would not want to be "sovereign" then.

Point is: This discussion is much more multi-dimensional than some suggest.

▲

embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

So literally a computer at home/in the office, as with anything else you don't really "own" the infrastructure? Or is this just about "cloud"?

▲

icy 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah sorry it's marketing BS speak for self-hosted or just infra that you control. It could be a VPS, it could be a Raspberry Pi at home. Your repos live on your servers. (And we support this on Tangled today!)

▲

embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> just infra that you control

But a VPS isn't actually infrastructure you control, you essentially have as much control over it as "cloud", so I don't think that'd be counted as "sovereign", would it?

	▲	icy 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Perhaps, but it's still better than nothing!