| ▲ | fontain 3 hours ago | |
Personally, I’m sympathetic. We know that GitHub did a huge amount of work over the last decade to make Git scale, which has benefited us all. These new scaling challenges are real challenges, 30x growth would be a nightmare for any system that was already pushing the limits of what was possible, I think we are being far too hard on GitHub, they deserve a little grace. | ||
| ▲ | remus 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
For all the negatives about github I agree. They offer a lot of free stuff, and LLMs seem likely to put massively increase their costs with no guarantee they'll be making money off it. I can't think of many (any?) large businesses which could scale up to meet so much new demand without some significant growing pains along the way. | ||
| ▲ | someone_eu 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
GitHub's scaling issues are caused by their own vendor-lock approach and monopoly. Yes, of course _their_ goal is to be even bigger and even more all-consuming, so _they_ have to deal with the scale. Why a user would be sympathetic to that? The user (and not a big tech monopoly) answer to scaling issues is almost always to stop scaling and start federating and interoperating. | ||