| ▲ | adgjlsfhk1 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
note that many (most?) THC DUIs have very little evidence. thc stays in your system for at least a month, so it's very hard to tell how many of these are actual DUIs vs cops deciding to pull over a (usually black) person and make up some signs to justify an arrest+drug test | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | defrost 2 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> so it's very hard to tell how many of these are actual DUIs vs cops deciding to pull over a (usually black) It's easier if you look at (say) Australian road traffic enforcement statistics; they have different rules than the US, have the "right" to check for DUI without having to make up a reason, and operate by funnelled road blocks that check everybody (or every second car, etc, depending on flow rates and breath check speeds). They also 'verify' in the sense that any driver can challenge and get a "better than road side" test back at the station under supervision (blood tests with saved samples for court challenges, etc). | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||