| ▲ | AirMax98 4 hours ago | |||||||
Quote from article: > This wasn’t targeting a single individual or business. It had the ability to reach thousands of devices at once. This statement reads as AI-assisted — kinda interesting to see, because I am not sure it even is? This type of formal speech language is basically unintelligible from slop now. | ||||||||
| ▲ | bawolff 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
This reads like a pretty standard sentence to me. Especially in the context of a police press release trying to explain tech to the public. I think at some point people see AI everywhere because they look for it everywhere. | ||||||||
| ▲ | dumpsterdiver an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Are you trying to make a point that we should remain open to the possibility that humans can express themselves eloquently? | ||||||||
| ▲ | tamimio 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
It’s there to prevent “public panic” ie they weren’t after you specifically or after xyz group, but just random mass attacks, or to prevent more cases and parties to be involved | ||||||||
| ▲ | fragmede 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I mean, you used an emdash. Are you an LLM? | ||||||||
| ||||||||