| ▲ | taeric 11 hours ago | |
This assumes that most people would choose that feed? Which, I'm less convinced. That is, this sounds like the idea that telling people if bad things happen when you eat too much candy, then people will eat less candy. Just flat not the case at large. Yes, you also have to document the downsides of candy. Such that I'm also all for having that feed. But I don't see it being enough to move the needle much, on its own. | ||
| ▲ | chucksmash 10 hours ago | parent [-] | |
> That is, this sounds like the idea that telling people if bad things happen when you eat too much candy, then people will eat less candy. Just flat not the case at large. Seems like there's an effect but it just takes time. The younger generations are smoking and drinking less. Maybe the trend will be to abstain from social media feeds and chronological feeds will be their Zima. | ||