| ▲ | 1970-01-01 2 days ago |
| I'm surprised GitLab isn't getting more attention. Yes, its not a carbon copy, but it is close. Apples and pears instead of oranges. |
|
| ▲ | BoingBoomTschak 2 days ago | parent [-] |
| It's close in the sense that it's also Jabbascript SPA crap that needs a supercomputer just to (try and fail to) display a diff of a few thousands lines, you mean? We're using it at work and it sucks massively. |
| |
| ▲ | ahartmetz 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I'd rather have the open core one running on my own servers (i.e. GitLab), but performance is a few orders of magnitude away from acceptable for both Git**b. | |
| ▲ | estimator7292 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | I run GitLab and its CI on a Xeon server from 2010. It's fine. It runs exactly as fast as anything else on that machine. I've also run it on a tiny AWS instance. Also fine. I don't like that the idle CPU load is high (for really inane reasons) but it performs perfectly well. |
|
