| ▲ | magicalist 3 hours ago | |
I'll wait for the transcript but happy to listen if you have a timestamp. > Later the same question was put to the government, and they admitted the same: under the government's theory a warrant would not be needed. You said the opposite: > Responder says the email, photos, and docs still need a warrant because they're like your thoughts or mail From Orin Kerr's live tweets (Feigin for DOJ, Unikowsky for Chatrie) of what I believe you were summarizing there: > Barrett: I'm concerned with your position being maximalist, too. Calendars, photos, email. And monitoring of homes. Are you conceding this would be a search? > Feigin: Warrant is needed for calendars, photos, email. [OK comments: Virtual lockers]. Not conceding homes. ... > Finally, Unikowksy rebuttal: We welcome the government's concession as to calendars, photos. But I don't understand how they distinguish that from this. https://bsky.app/profile/orinkerr.bsky.social/post/3mkigsbw6... | ||