> They redefined AGI to be an economical thing Huh. Source?

I don't think your original comment deserve to be downvoted. (Calling someone illiterate, on the other hand.)

But the "it" I was asking about was "AGI" as "an economical thing." You technically correctly answered how OpenAI defines AGI in public, i.e. with no reference to profits. But it did not address the economic definition OP initially alluded to.

For what it's worth, I could have been clearer in my ask.