|
| ▲ | marricks 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > OpenAI is worth many multiples of that valued at --which I'd say is a reasonable distinction to make right about now |
| |
|
| ▲ | HWR_14 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| When they put 10B in, they got weird tiered revenue shares and other rights. That has been simplified to 27% of OpenAI today. I don't know what that meant their 10B would be worth before dilution in later rounds. |
|
| ▲ | bmitc 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > OpenAI is worth many multiples of that. How? |
| |
| ▲ | senordevnyc 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Because they recently issued shares at a price many multiples of that, and people bought them. How else would you define financial worth? | | |
| ▲ | andriy_koval an hour ago | parent [-] | | I would use your number adjusted by some demand elasticity curve. | | |
| ▲ | tanseydavid 27 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The "back-of-the-napkin" only has enough room to estimate based on recently issued share price. Seems reasonable to me. |
|
|
|
