| ▲ | sleepybrett 6 hours ago |
| wasn't it capped at 3tb? is the drive swappable to something bigger? They discontinues them in 2018, the wifi in them is old, single disk (no raid).. better to just pick up a multidrive nas or use cloud backups. What we should be asking for is timemachine backends for cloud providers. |
|
| ▲ | TimTheTinker 6 hours ago | parent [-] |
| It's not "officially" supported, but iFixit has a guide for swapping the drive on a time capsule. I used mine with a 4TB drive for years with no trouble. |
| |
| ▲ | sleepybrett 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sure, but still just a single drive. My old trusty readynas should still work i think.. probalby. Supports smd for time machine and smb3 generally. If it doesn't I might finally be pushed onto a nas that isn't discontinued. | | |
| ▲ | bananamogul 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I had an early ReadyNAS that was a champ for years. I wonder if the fact that it was based on SPARC had anything to do with its longevity. | |
| ▲ | iAMkenough 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | From a risk assessment standpoint, I’ve seen my Time Machine backups corrupted much more frequently than I’ve experienced drive failure. Happened with both my Time Capsule and then my Synology RAID. It’s a “nice to have” automatic backup, but not a primary backup destination for me. |
|
|