| ▲ | bcjdjsndon 15 hours ago |
| If you can't even tell it's AI and need to be told... then what's the problem? Personal preference? It's like only enjoying paintings if the artist used horse hair and horse hair alone for their paintbrush.... A very arbitrary constraint |
|
| ▲ | breezybottom 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| You really underestimate the LOTR fandom if you think they can't tell that the map is wrong. |
| |
|
| ▲ | LastTrain 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If I forged a Picasso and convinced someone to buy it, did I do anything wrong? |
|
| ▲ | Kye 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Look at the names on the map. You don't need to be a LOTR superfan to tell something is off. |
| |
| ▲ | boxed 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | So it's not actually about AI at all? It's about it being incorrect? | | |
| ▲ | buescher 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It’s about humans presenting something plausibly awful in a deceptive way, and using a machine to be plausible and deceptive. | |
| ▲ | bcjdjsndon 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The telly tale flip flopping of someone driven by emotion not logic | | |
| ▲ | tsunagatta 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's not flip-flopping, they're answering the question that you posed. You claimed that the constraint is arbitrary, they demonstrated how it isn't. | | |
| |
| ▲ | Kye 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's incorrect because it was lazily AI-generated. Most modern AI image generators can handle this if you're the least bit thoughtful. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nkrisc 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Because the existing cultural understanding of art is that someone took the time to create what you’re experiencing. AI generated “art” subverts that expectation. It feels deceptive. Honestly it reminds of Duchamp’s Fountain and similar works, which some people hated for more or less the same reason. I am not equating AI slop with Marcel Duchamp, however. His work and what he did was very much intentional to evoke the sort of reactions it did. |
| |
| ▲ | PurpleRamen 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Moleskin is selling notebooks, not art. They happen to come with graphical elements, but I don't see them claiming those are art. So where is the deception? | | |
| ▲ | vova_hn2 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Moleskin is selling notebooks When I need a notebook, I just go into a store that sells them and grab whatever they have. I have a notebook for logging my exercises and another one for random stuff, I have no idea what brand they are. Moleskin sells fashion items. Or, maybe, an idea of a certain lifestyle. I'm not sure. | |
| ▲ | nkrisc 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I’m speaking about negative reactions toward AI created imagery. | |
| ▲ | palmotea 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Moleskin is selling notebooks, not art. They happen to come with graphical elements, but I don't see them claiming those are art. So where is the deception? Come on, they're selling notebooks with art on them. Cheap, AI-generated art, passed off as premium. |
| |
| ▲ | bcjdjsndon 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >Because the existing cultural understanding of art is that someone took the time to create what you’re experiencing. AI generated “art” subverts that expectation And? I don't care. Is the art good or not? I'm not searching for someone to admire, I just want good music | |
| ▲ | ludicrousdispla 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You could even say that AI generated art is an experience that artists chose to not create. |
|
|
| ▲ | readthenotes1 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The AI art debate reminds me a bit of the blowback from Miles Davis, a famous at the time jazz musician, recording Sketches of Spain, which is not jazz. His response was "it's music, and I like it". Some of those pictures? I like them. |
