Is it actually privacy preserving? Chrome mostly exists to extract all the information from a user it can without immediately getting a lawsuit of greater penalty than what is gained through ads, military contracts, etc. Android isn't too far off either. I would welcome any alternative to this. I can see applications for this being things like "while device is at rest and charging summarize all of the users recent text communications" or whatever else as a legal loop hole for wiretap laws

▲

gruez an hour ago | parent [-]

>I can see applications for this being things like "while device is at rest and charging summarize all of the users recent text communications" or whatever else as a legal loop hole for wiretap laws

This just exposes an API for sites to use. If they wanted to do the types of spying you're cynically suggesting, they could just add it without an API and you'd be none the wiser. Chrome contains closed source components so you wouldn't even know.

▲

2ndorderthought an hour ago | parent [-]

It's a lot easier to hide the language they need in a EULA for a feature like this than it would be elsewhere.

I appreciate you feel this is a cynical take. But have you seen the class action lawsuits against Google over the last 5 years? They exceed a billion dollars as far as I can remember and they are for more blatant things than this.

	▲	gruez 14 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		>It's a lot easier to hide the language they need in a EULA for a feature like this than it would be elsewhere. Why would adding a ML API or library require an EULA change?