>We very obviously are not just a series of weights for probable next tokens.

How exactly? Except via handwaving? I refer to the "brain as prediction machine theory" which is the dominant one atm.

>you can even ask an LLM and it will tell you our brains work differently to it

It will just tell me platitudes based on weights of the millions of books and articles and such on its training. Kind of like what a human would tell me.

>and that’s not even including the possibility that we have a soul or any other spiritual substrait.

That's good, because I wasn't including it either.