That’s a wild reason to withhold a true record. People run marathons in all sorts of conditions since it became a thing. It is unlikely this is the best weather ever for a record set and even if it was, it’s never been a factor when deciding to qualify a record. That’s beyond unfair.

▲

Noaidi 8 hours ago | parent [-]

I am surprised at the push back on this. It is just science and it mentioned it in the article.

https://marathonhandbook.com/large-scale-marathon-study-iden...

I just said it needs an asterisk, not withholding anything. What if someone runs one second slower in higher humidity and temperature. Now that I would applaud.

	▲	ekr____ 8 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Why do you think the existing records weren't also set under good conditions?
	▲	lazyasciiart 8 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		What was the temperature and humidity for the previous record? Or the rest of the top 10?
	▲	Forgeties79 6 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> I just said it needs an asterisk, not withholding anything It’s essentially the same as not setting the record. It would be qualified every single time it’s mentioned and be functionally saying “…so it doesn’t count.”