| ▲ | cowthulhu 8 hours ago |
| Wow, that’s ~13 mph, basically a full-on sprint for a mere mortal. Absolutely insane. |
|
| ▲ | PaulDavisThe1st 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The fastest marathoners are moving at 4m30sec per mile or faster. Very few mere mortals could run that fast for even 100m. |
| |
| ▲ | jmb99 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Very few mere mortals could run that fast for even 100m. That works out to roughly a 16.7-second 100m. While certainly not crawling, that would be a fairly average pace for a fairly fit middle- to early-high-schooler with a bit of practice. Yes that’s insane to maintain for a marathon, but it’s not even remotely out of reach for 100m for most relatively-fit people at some point in their lives. | | |
| ▲ | croemer 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think it's even slow for high schoolers. I didn't practice that much and ran 100m in 12.5s from rest at my peak. 4s slower is snail pace. I think most in my class could run that fast (or slow). | | |
| ▲ | jmb99 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | I agree. I ran mid 16s in 8th grade, and was in the 14s in high school, with the only training being whatever we did in gym class. But I do also look at the sheer number of overweight kids these days and figured, well maybe mid-16s is actually a reasonable average point. | | |
| ▲ | brewdad 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Oh it is. At a typical large high school making the team puts you in the top 1% or better of athletic ability compared to the population at large. At my peak, I finished the NYC Marathon in the top 2%. I still finished 45 minutes behind the winner. It feels like elite athletes aren’t even competing in the same sport. |
|
| |
| ▲ | 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | PaulDavisThe1st 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's the "at some point in their lives" that matters here. For most folks, the period where a 16.7 100m is feasible is pretty short. |
| |
| ▲ | petepete 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There's an interesting video by Mark Lewis on this. https://youtu.be/xkBmYQucyMs | |
| ▲ | hackingonempty 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Here's a random high school in Northern California. Everyone on the team is beating 16.7 seconds in the 100m. For the 1600m there are six kids with times under 4m30s and another seven with times under 4m40s, all in the last month. https://www.athletic.net/team/770/track-and-field-outdoor/20... * of course one mile is hardly comparable to the marathon that pros are able to sustain such speeds over... | | |
| ▲ | sethev 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Not sure that disproves the point :) Most people have never been anywhere close to competing with the top 6 athletes at a high school with ~2k students. | | |
| ▲ | hackingonempty 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | There are thousands of these high schools all across the USA. The top high schoolers in California so far this year are doing 1600m in 4m7s. https://www.athletic.net/TrackAndField/rankings/list/168546/... | | |
| ▲ | PaulDavisThe1st 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | OK, so let's do the math. There's about 25k high schools in the USA. Let's suppose they all have a track team, and let's assume that they all have 5 team members who can break 04:30 for 1600m. Sure, at some schools that's too few, but at others it is too many. That gives us 125k high schoolers in the USA who can break 04:30 for 1600m. There are about 18M high school students. So of just the high school population alone, about 0.7% of them can do this. Assuming there are the 4x as many adults that can do this as there are high school students, that gives us slightly less than 0.2% of the total US population capable of this. I rest my case. | |
| ▲ | maxerickson 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What do you want most to mean here? |
|
| |
| ▲ | hyperpape 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Unless kids have gotten a lot faster in the past 25 years, I think that's a lot better than a typical 2000 person high school. | |
| ▲ | PaulDavisThe1st 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | How many kids at the school? |
| |
| ▲ | jonplackett 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Sometimes they have big running machines with a crash mat around them running at 2h marathon pace at running shows. I’ve o ly seen them on video - no one can keep up with it for more than 30 odd seconds. It’s INSANE they are running this fast. Also bear in mind running a single mile under 4 mins was considered impossible for a long time. | |
| ▲ | acomjean 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | We used to be amazed when I ran cross country in high school that these pro marathoners would best all of us in our approx 5K(3ish mile) races and then go on to repeat that distance multiple times. It’s totally remarkable. |
|
|
| ▲ | soupfordummies 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah I can barely even ride my bike that fast much less keep that pace for two hours. |
| |
|
| ▲ | fredley 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| He did his _last_ mile in 4.17. Insane. |
|
| ▲ | mkl 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| 21.19km/h on average, or 17 seconds per hundred metres on average. |
|
| ▲ | croemer 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| No, it's slower than most people's sprints. It's 17 seconds per 100 metres which is slow. Most teenagers can do this starting from rest. |
|
| ▲ | Cthulhu_ 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I'm not a runner at all, but people say that they can do that for like a minute, maybe two at best... and these guys did it for two hours straight. |
