| ▲ | vetrom 4 hours ago |
| https://robindev.substack.com/p/cloudflare-took-down-our-web... - one of a number of citations. To find more insert the terms [Cloudflare, hostage] into your favorite search engine. |
|
| ▲ | Silhouette 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Whatever was really happening in that incident it seems clear that it was not a simple matter of having registered some domains with Cloudflare and then getting a shakedown for $100k+ because of that. If anyone else chooses to read the post then I suggest skimming the comments (that are mostly hidden by default) as well. |
| |
| ▲ | vetrom 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | The point isnt the apologists that pop up whereever CF gets mentioned, the point is that they more or less have a built reputation for deceptive loss leader marketing. Maybe early/MVP product engineers should know better, but CFs own education materials do not teach you to expect that. | | |
| ▲ | Silhouette 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I have no financial or professional connection to Cloudflare as far as I know and that's partly because I'm not sure I like the way they operate and the level of control over everyone's access to the Web they now have. But if we're going to criticise then I think it should be on a reasonable and preferably objective basis. The claim I challenged appears to be the complete opposite of that unfortunately. | |
| ▲ | otterley 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | jolux 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Cmon, this is the guy that was running a shady online casino which was tanking Cloudflare’s IP reputation, completely different. |
| |
| ▲ | gzread an hour ago | parent [-] | | Cloudflare didn't give them the option to quit hosting with CF and port their domains out. It held the domains hostage because the domains were registered through CF. |
|