You've cited another two anecdotes. Back up your fucking claim.

> some weird role-play poser fetish I guess.

Really? Do you actually want to argue your point or is negative attention your fetish?

^this kind of argument is not fucking productive.

> But be honest - you don't really care about evidence.

You're the one making an emotional argument here without citing anything.

I don't cycle. I appreciate walkable cities with bike lanes, and live in a country where cyclists respect the law.

I do actually care about evidence. If you would fucking care to cite some.

So CITE YOUR SOURCES.

	▲	messe 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		This isn't an example of that. You claimed something in your initial comment. You did not back it up. I'm asking you to back up your initial claim. If you had addressed it you'd have a point, and that would be a correct example of sealioning. But you haven't, so don't accuse me of sealioning. This isn't me arguing in bad faith. This is me asking you to back up the claim you made in your first comment. That's arguing in good faith, if you only you are willing to provide the other side of the argument. Which you have avoided so far.