Let me rephrase that for you: red is for people who live in this world and accept it, blue is for people with white knight syndrome.

OR. Red is for people who understand statistics, blue is for people who like to gamble.

▲

polotics 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Blue is what gamble? there is no gain associated with choosing blue over red, just pointless risk-taking with only at best a zero outcome.

▲

hypeatei 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> red is for people who live in this world and accept it

Red is for people who don't think beyond the end of their nose. Okay, you're very smart and understand statistics, but what about the following groups: friends, family, spouses? If they don't pick red, and they die, would you say life is completely fine because there's less "dumb" people or would you possibly think: "hmm, it kinda sucks that they died, maybe I should've picked blue?"

GP is correct that red is the anti-social / myopic option.

▲

throwaway173738 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If this was a real thing I’d pick red and then stand outside the red/blue clinic with a sign urging everyone to pick red.

▲

Hackbraten 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> If they don't pick red

Why wouldn't they?

▲

selfhoster1312 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Because most people have empathy and collective consciousness. Apart from ultra-capitalist individualists, most people choose trust and cooperations, because we're hard-wired for that and that's how species develop and thrive (see also, science).

	▲	revlsas 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Humans are conditionally cooperative When we suspect some people are not cooperative then it gets reciprocated