| ▲ | threepts 8 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Why don't they ask their premier model to generate a bench for them? Jokes aside, a benchmark I look forward to is ARC-AGI-3. I tried out their human simulation, and it feels very reasoning heavy. Leaderboard: https://arcprize.org/leaderboard (Most premier models don't even pass 5 percent.) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | falcor84 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
They focus on minimizing the number of moves and don't allow any harness whatsoever, putting the bar extremely high. The current top verified contender (Claude Opus 4.6) is at only 0.45%. But with how new it is, I expect a lot of improvement in the next generation of models. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | sowbug 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Why don't they ask their premier model to generate a bench for them? It's not a crazy idea. Have the older model interview the newer one and then ask both (or maybe a third referee model) which one they think is smarter. Repeat 100x with different seeds. The percentage of times both sides agree the newer model won is the score. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | alansaber 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Very (reasoning) heavy benchmarks do seem like the way to go, being the hardest to game. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | xtracto 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Can AI write a problem so difficult that even AI cannot solve? Hehe | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | therealdrag0 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
[dead] | |||||||||||||||||||||||