Same legacy news presenters which have a track record of pushing UFO conspiracy theories?

CNN was one of the biggest pushers of this hoax: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_drone_sight...

HauntingPin 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

CNN is basically on the same level as Fox News now. I'm not surprised.

Here's a more substantial take on the whole thing that doesn't just blindly repeat everything without question: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/2026/04/missing-scientis... You know, what journalism is actually supposed to be like.

This BBC article https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyw9rpdl4po also has this tidbit:

> "The US Top Secret-cleared aerospace and nuclear workforce is ~700,000 people," science writer, investigator and pseudoscience debunker Mick West wrote on 16 April on his Substack.

> "Ordinary mortality over 22 months predicts ~4,000 deaths, ~70 homicides, and ~180 suicides. The list has 10 … The deaths are real. The families' grief is real. The pattern is not."

▲

OutOfHere 4 hours ago | parent [-]

If you are going to rudely link to a paywalled articles without an unpaywalled link to read each, then people can't be motivated to read them.

▲

HauntingPin 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I guess being an asshole is just the standard now on HN? How is this attitude acceptable? What did I do to you? I didn't even realize it was paywalled until you mentioned it. But don't let that stop you from being a dick to somebody who's just trying to help fight misinformation. I guess I'll just go fuck myself.

But here, your paywall free link: https://archive.is/KNECz

	▲	OutOfHere 15 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		If anything, it is you who were closer to being the a by posting what you did without corresponding unpaywalled links. Moreover, it is you who resorted to namecalling, not me. You should know what you're posting; you don't get to be ignorant about it. Even the BBC link you posted is paywalled and therefore unreadable. Whether the concern is real or not is precisely for the FBI to determine. National security is too serious to leave in the hands of random journalists and overly-comfortable citizens. I fully understand that the data is almost certainly a coincidence, but the consequences of being wrong are so serious that it's best to definitively rule it out.
	▲	kQq9oHeAz6wLLS 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Unfortunately, this is a sign of the times we live in now. Nobody extends a little grace to others. They assume every act is an intentional slight. There's no room for mistakes or even differences of opinions, and it's tearing us apart. Part of it, I think, comes from the anonymous nature of online communications, and little to no ramifications to bad behavior. It's the end result of "I can do whatever I want, the established rules and societal norms don't apply anymore."

▲

jasonlotito 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> The FBI now says it “is spearheading the effort to look for connections into the missing and deceased scientists,” adding that it “is working with the Department of Energy, Department of War, and with our state … and local law enforcement partners to find answers.”

> Separately, the Republican-led House Oversight Committee announced Monday it will investigate ...

So, do we not want the news reporting what the government is doing? That's the FBI, DoE, DoD, and the House Oversight Committee putting effort into this.

Like, no, i want this reported, not because there is anything that will come from it, but because we should report one what the government is doing.

Why do you think CNN should NOT report one what the government does?

	▲	walletdrainer 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You can report these stories without sanewashing.