That is a really limiting license.

Per the LICENSE file:

  Modification Ban: The User has no right to change, modify, decompile, disassemble or create derivative works based on the Program.

  Distribution Ban: The User has no right to distribute the Program without the prior written permission of the Licensor.

▲ gwerbin 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's source-available proprietary software that happens to be distributed through NPM.

▲

oefrha 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It's not source available, there's only bundled minified code looking like https://unpkg.com/ooko@0.121.0/static/js/main..js

If this is source available then every website is source available.

	▲	reactordev 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		But every website is source available. How else would you render it? Streaming PNGs?

▲ okovooo 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I can't afford a free license. I have no sponsors and have been unemployed for a year. It's rare for a free-source project to succeed, so I decided not to use a free license initially.

▲

inlustra 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I find this response a little odd. Absolutely respect the work you’ve put in, but explaining that it doesn’t have a free license because you’ve been unemployed is just bad marketing.

“It doesn’t have a free license because I believe in the product and think it stands out enough to warrant people paying for it” is probably the route you want to go.

	▲	okovooo 41 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I'll think about your words, thank you.
	▲	brazukadev 43 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> I find this response a little odd You find honesty a little odd? That's quite odd.