| ▲ | collinfunk 5 hours ago | |
> There are some pretty substantial differences. Russia is on the strategic back foot here trying to figure out a way to stop NATO's advance. His rationale for invading Ukraine was to "demilitarise and denazify" it. The NATO point seems largely be invented by people who dislike NATO in the west. > They've only turned to violence after long attempts at resolving the tension diplomatically and the US has been implacable. I hope the "tension" you are referring to was not the little green men taking over Crimea and the Donbas in 2014. > Putin's actually been pretty hesitant in his escalations so far; he's 70 and has a long history of trying to avoid war. This is a totally unseriousness statement. Can you remind me what Putin was doing in Syria again? | ||
| ▲ | roenxi 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |
There's an english transcript [0] of his speech from when they went in up on the Kremin website. He opened with something like > I will begin with what I said in my address on February 21, 2022. I spoke about our biggest concerns and worries, and about the fundamental threats which irresponsible Western politicians created for Russia consistently, rudely and unceremoniously from year to year. I am referring to the eastward expansion of NATO, which is moving its military infrastructure ever closer to the Russian border. They're claiming the NATO thing is relevant. Opening paragraph justification. | ||