Solving open math problems is strong evidence of intelligence so there's not really any need for rationalization? I don't understand why intelligence would require intent or motive? Isn't intent just the behaviour of making a specific thing happen rather than other things?

▲

x3ro 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm curious, do you think that this also applies to stable diffusion? Are these models "creative" too?

	▲	resident423 10 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I haven't used stable diffusion enough to have a strong opinion on it. But my thinking is LLMs have only recently started contributing novel solutions to problems, so maybe there is some threshold above which there's less sloppy remixing of training data and more ability to form novel insights, and image generators haven't crossed this line yet.
	▲	famouswaffles 11 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yeah? Those models are creative.

▲

0xBA5ED 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The LLM did not solve the problem.

	▲	baxtr 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Who did then?