|
| ▲ | magicalhippo 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > This is the kind of scientific research which companies don't generally pay for because it doesn't have direct commercial application Tom over at the Explosions&Fire channel (and Extractions&Ire channel) just published a video[1] about his academic career. In it he noted that in Australia where he's located, the defense companies were an exception to that general rule, and did indeed sponsor a fair bit of basic research, including his PhD. I assume in areas they figured had potential, but still. [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CbdVkcr-Nw |
| |
| ▲ | FireBeyond 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Even so, Australia still has the CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization) so there's that funding and research too, which actually has, per capita, about a similar funding (equivalent of US$9B adjusted), though they generally do most of that research 'in house' versus funding it externally. |
|
|
| ▲ | LeCompteSftware 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The more important research is the kind that the economy doesn't especially benefit from, but which needs to happen in order to improve the quality of human life. I had a job paid by the National Science Foundation, doing genomics research on children with extremely rare (sometimes unique) genetic diseases. We did publish papers, and Big Pharma can glean a little bit about how we handled the biomedical informatics of managing data across different highly specialized labs, maybe a researcher will incrementally improve GWAS across the field. But that research was important because actual human children were suffering and needed help. |
|
| ▲ | ivewonyoung 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| . |
| |
| ▲ | simonw 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | See sibling comment - NSF also funds science which doesn't have direct or indirect commercial applications (I shouldn't have implied that only commercial applications matter): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47906005 What kind of an agenda does studying Gendered impact of COVID-19 in the Arctic carry? |
|