Remix.run Logo
joe_mamba 4 hours ago

Why do you ask? Do you assume those fired NSF workers want to go work in China now? Or that China manages its domestic variant of the NSF better and accepts people critical of the CCP ideology?

fc417fc802 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I would tend to assume that the people overseeing the NSF are accomplished scientists. China has been more than happy to recruit those for at least the past couple decades. That said, I doubt this move negatively impacts their careers so I don't expect this alone would motivate any of them to leave the country. Other things might though.

> Or that China manages its domestic variant of the NSF better

Prior to Trump probably yes. Post Trump almost certainly.

> and accepts people critical of the CCP ideology?

Obviously not. But why are you assuming that those removed from their posts were vocal critics of the CCP?

throwaway27448 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Most people in china are not members of the CPC. And yes, they clearly are more competent.

joe_mamba 2 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

gverrilla 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> The country has a social credit score

Fake news.

XorNot 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"but China is worse!" is an excuse wearing well past paper thin at this point.

solid_fuel 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> The country has a social credit score

Yeah that is concerning. Glad the US doesn't have any sort of credit scoring system that might make it hard to get out of poverty. That would be really scary. Imagine if you had to pass a credit check to get an apartment!

Spooky23 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Our entire economy is built on scientific advancement and advantage. The dismantling of everything to maximize executive power in order to maximize grift and corruption will have effects for decades.

This is the American version of the cultural revolution. We’re pushing people to be plumbers instead of scientists.

throwworhtthrow an hour ago | parent [-]

> Our entire economy is built on scientific advancement and advantage.

Devil's advocate: Only productivity gains, not the entire economy, are built on scientific advancement. But wages haven't grown with productivity in half a century, so the loss of scientific advantage won't affect wage growth, therefore the economy will be fine.

(I know it's not convincing, but it's the best I can conjure.)