| ▲ | ip26 14 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
If companies are faced with the choice between: - employ you at 60k/yr - replace you with a machine that costs a lot of money, and also send you UBI of 60k/yr It should be obvious the latter is not an option that is ever going to happen. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | xboxnolifes 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
What if the machine in this context is 3x as productive as you? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | JeremyNT 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The solution to the subsequent devaluation of labor, and ability for tech oligarchs to pocket the cash instead, will not be found in capitalism. Unless we are all to become serfs, a new way to distribute resources needs to be on the table. UBI is a salve, offered to keep victims of the system out of abject poverty. It is too little, too late. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mschuster91 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The problem is, companies will go for the third route: hire a company in India to launder AI. It has already worked out once with the offshoring wave. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||