Remix.run Logo
ip26 14 hours ago

If companies are faced with the choice between:

- employ you at 60k/yr

- replace you with a machine that costs a lot of money, and also send you UBI of 60k/yr

It should be obvious the latter is not an option that is ever going to happen.

xboxnolifes 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What if the machine in this context is 3x as productive as you?

hettygreen 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Then it replaces 3 people's jobs, requiring paying 3 UBI's in this thought experiment.

JeremyNT 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The solution to the subsequent devaluation of labor, and ability for tech oligarchs to pocket the cash instead, will not be found in capitalism.

Unless we are all to become serfs, a new way to distribute resources needs to be on the table.

UBI is a salve, offered to keep victims of the system out of abject poverty. It is too little, too late.

fireflash38 27 minutes ago | parent [-]

We are returning to feudalism, with a cyberpunk spin on it.

You will not own anything. You don't even really own your tech now.

The writing is on the wall: you will not be allowed to modify what you own.

mschuster91 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The problem is, companies will go for the third route: hire a company in India to launder AI. It has already worked out once with the offshoring wave.

bluefirebrand 14 hours ago | parent [-]

This will still wind up with them paying UBI eventually

DaSHacka 10 hours ago | parent [-]

For the Indians?