Remix.run Logo
lucb1e 5 hours ago

In case the authors are here, the first sentence contains the bytes e2 80 94 which would be UTF-8 for an em dash, but it has been reinterpreted as 3 bytes using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows-1252#Code_page_layout and shown on the page as —. Further down, there's a lot of similar errors such as a single right quote (U+2019) in K'nex. Firefox seems to have first removed their encoding configuration menu in version 89, then introduced a new button in version 91, and that one is disabled now as well so there's no fixing this user-side it seems :/

Edit: ah the page is from 2012-03-19, from the <meta property="article:published_time"> tag

londons_explore 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is probably the case of a bodged migration from one CMS to another.

My blog suffered the same, and going through loads of old pages to check and fix them just isn't worth the effort.

QuantumNomad_ 9 minutes ago | parent [-]

The archived version from 2012 is showing the characters correct. So probably some migration like you said.

https://web.archive.org/web/20120319180000/https://fffff.at/...

The website itself has been closed since 2015 according to the front page.

https://fffff.at/

Which also suffers from encoding problems making weird characters show up.

But which was showing the characters the way it should on August 1st 2015 when the site was closing down.

https://web.archive.org/web/20150801234212/http://fffff.at/

Who wants to bet that at some point after the closing of the site, they switched over from a live CMS to a static copy of the site and in the process of doing so things got a little screwed up when exporting data from a MySQL database with the different encoding weirdnesses that can sometimes occur with MySQL and how the db schema was set there.

taneq 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Why shouldn’t we be able to?

I have no idea why but my brain immediately interpreted this as a Scottish accent, like ‘shouldnae’. Weird.

dasyatidprime an hour ago | parent [-]

… because "â€" and "ae" are visually similar?