Great site, thanks for the link. But holy heck, that "Also Known As" column is complete chaos. What the heck is wrong with the USB Consortium, do they have brain damage?

Also, according to that table, "USB4 Gen 2×2" is a downgrade on "USB 3.2 Gen 2x2", since the cable length is 0.8m instead of 1m for the same speeds. Which is uhh unexpected.

▲

BearOso 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The cable length is only for the spec. You can get longer cables that achieve the higher bandwidth, they're just not certified for that.

▲

Someone1234 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Right, so per spec it is a downgrade.

▲

mort96 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

And? The question stands, why is the USB 4 spec a downgrade?

	▲	BearOso 30 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Probably because with USB 3.2 2x2 they were reviewing too many longer cables that didn't meet the requirements, so they lowered the length so companies didn't submit them only to fail to get certified. It's worth noting that 1.2m is now in the USB4 spec.