| ▲ | hsbauauvhabzb 4 hours ago | |
For those of us who don’t know, how does it save power vs a 1gbe running at low throughput? | ||
| ▲ | jech 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
> how does [100BASE-TX] save power vs [1000BASE-T] running at low throughput? 100BASE-TX uses just two pairs (lanes), one for sending and one for receiving. 1000BASE-T uses all four pairs, for both sending and receiving. Therefore, a 100BASE-TX interface that's only receiving needs to power up one pair. A 1000BASE-T interface needs to power all four pairs all the time. I recall reading about some extensions that allow switching off some of the pairs some of the time ("Green Ethernet"), but I think that they require support on both sides of the link, and I'm not sure if they are widely deployed. | ||
| ▲ | adastra22 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I assume it is for wake-on-LAN. This of course requires the NIC being powered on while the system is sleeping. Lower bandwidth mode = less power draw. | ||