This presupposes that the OSS creator even wants users in the first place, which might not always be the case as it could be personal software; and that these users actually want these features, as many do not want analytics, ads, and A/B tests in your app.

▲

janalsncm 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I guess in the same way that one might presuppose a boat wants water?

If a piece of software doesn’t have users and the developers don’t care about the papercuts they are delivering, I would argue what they have created is more of an art project than a utility.

	▲	notarobot123 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Science research without obvious practical application can still be important and valuable. Art works without popular appeal can become highly treasured by some. Open source software doesn't have to be ambitious to be worthwhile and useful. It can be artful, utilitarian or a artifact of play. Commercial standards shouldn't be the only measure of good software.
	▲	satvikpendem 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		It's more like building your own boat then someone else coming along and saying it'll never compete with a cruise ship because it doesn't have a water slide and endless buffet; sometimes, things in the same category can serve wholly different purposes.