Wait what? How did we go from "Users of social media need to be at least 16" to "Users of OSes need to prove they are adults"?

▲

Matl 5 hours ago | parent [-]

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Debian-Undecided-Age-Laws

I have nothing against Instagram asking me if I am over 16, but these laws end up with my OS not allowing requests to instagram unless I prove to it that I am over 16 with a photo ID is where we're going.

▲

embedding-shape 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Sounds like the situation might end up with Instagram not accepting requests unless you're using an OS that follows those sorts of laws, which is kind of an inversion of what you said, and I think I'm fine with that outcome if so be it. Websites should be allowed to decide who's visiting them, unless they're government, utility or other basic needs portals.

	▲	Matl 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Fair, maybe. That'd be the better case I suppose. However that be more like banking apps not liking rooted phones. The California law is more like your OS not allowing you to access resources unless you prove your age, not the external resource doing so.
	▲	fc417fc802 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> Websites should be allowed to decide who's visiting them No, hold up, you just casually introduced a dystopian goal of facilitating the casual collection of government ID by website operators. I absolutely do not want the equivalent of South Korean ID numbers in order to do pretty much anything online. Anyway as I always point out when these threads come up we've yet to try the simple and noninvasive solution. Websites should be required to send a content categorization header. Large enterprises that fail to do so should be fined. If that were uniformly happening it would then be possible to do proper client side filtering (right now that fails miserably). Before anyone asks, app stores could be required to implement the equivalent of the header in an appropriate manner of their own design.