WWII was won by terror bombings of German cities, and terror nuclear bombing of Japanese cities. That's common knowledge.

Not mentioning the Soviet terror in Germany during and after the war, since the topic is the US.

It isn't really accurate to describe those bombings as terrorism when they happened during the largest war in human history.

	▲	antiframe 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		While I agree there's not a universally agreed upon definition of terrorism, I want to hear more about why you think bombing with novel munitions expressly delivered to dense urban areas which killed 250k people 90% of whom were civilian, in an attempt to scare them into surrender, is not "terrorism".