Doesn’t Obsidian already do pretty much the same?

tarr1124 15 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Obsidian and these newer tools share markdown + local files, but they're aimed at different assumptions about who reads and edits the vault. Obsidian's default is "human reads and curates; plugins optionally enhance." The AI-first cohort (Tolaria, Sig in the sibling comment, and several others) assumes the AI reads and writes as a first-class agent, which makes design choices like how the app reacts to files changing underneath it (cf. the Zettlr comment downthread) a core concern rather than an edge case.

Worth watching how each of these tools positions the AI: as a UX copilot inside the editor, or as an autonomous agent with file-system access via local CLI/MCP.

▲

kid64 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yes, but the claim is presumably that this one is good.

▲

hoppyhoppy2 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>open-source

▲

dragonfax an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Huh, somehow I had no idea that Obsidian wasn't open source. I guess I was fooled by the open source plugins.

▲

jimmcslim 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

And I was going to say Mac native as well, but uses Tauri. I’d love some app with the polish of Bear Notes but that just edited raw Markdown files. Ideally Obsidian with the Notebook Navigator plugin (strongly inspired by Bear Notes perhaps?) and (checks list) this very specific list of plugins that I need and should be good for everyone else thanks.

▲

bovermyer 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Zettlr would like a word.

	▲	morelikeborelax 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I really like Zettlr, but I find it is always crashing when markdown changes behind the scenes and it has the document open. It's so good for viewing all markdown in a repo, but dies all too often.

▲

jryio 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Exactly - cooperation is not incentivized properly

	▲	2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]