> Would you rather them never hire them in the first place?

It does seem like a lot of people would prefer this, they way they react to every layoff announcement.

It would be better because it would create a more diverse work space where multiple employers complete for employees, instead of one company playing musical chairs with people

▲

singpolyma3 2 days ago | parent [-]

Having fewer jobs available would result in more employers? I'm not sure how.

	▲	autaut 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		A few companies get almost all investments. They start a lot of projects fast and close the ones that don’t work If companies stuck to fewer projects, money would be invested in other companies focusing on specific products, you get a lot of companies and not the market concentration you got today (which is responsible according to few economists to a lot of the us labor market dysfunctions it is currently experiencing)