| ▲ | GistNoesis 7 hours ago |
| Isn't it awful ? After 5.5 versions it still can't draw a basic bike frame.
How is the front wheel supposed to turn sideways ? |
|
| ▲ | jetrink 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I feel like if I attempted this, the bike frame would look fine and everything else would be completely unrecognizable. After all, a basic bike frame is just straight lines arranged in a fairly simple shape. It's really surprising that models find it so difficult, but they can make a pelican with panache. |
| |
| ▲ | nlawalker 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > a fairly simple shape Bike frames are very hard to draw unless you've already consciously internalized the basic shape, see https://www.booooooom.com/2016/05/09/bicycles-built-based-on... | |
| ▲ | necubi 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Humans are also famously bad at drawing bicycles from memory https://www.gianlucagimini.it/portfolio-item/velocipedia/ | | | |
| ▲ | billywhizz 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | why do you find it surprising? these models have no actual understanding of anything, never mind the physical properties and capabilities of a bicycle. | |
| ▲ | fragmede 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | My question is, as a human, how well would you or I do under the same conditions? Which is to say, I could do a much better job in inkscape with Google images to back me up, but if I was blindly shitting vectors into an XML file that I can't render to see the results of, I'm not even going to get the triangles for the frame to line up, so this pelican is very impressive! |
|
|
| ▲ | simonw 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah, the bike frame is the thing I always look at first - it's still reasonably rare for a model to draw that correctly, although Qwen 3.6 and Gemini Pro 3.1 do that well now. |
|
| ▲ | loa_in_ 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The distinction is that it's not drawing. It's generating an SVG document containing descriptors of the shapes. |
