Why ban third party wrappers? All of this could've been sidestepped had you not banned them.

Because then they lose vertical integration and the extra ability it grants to tune settings to reduce costs / token use / response time for subscription users.

Or improve performance and efficiency, if we’re generous and give them the benefit of the doubt.

It makes sense, in a way. It means the subscription deal is something along the lines of fixed / predictable price in exchange for Anthropic controlling usage patterns, scheduling, throttling (quotas consumptions), defaults, and effective workload shape (system prompt, caching) in whatever way best optimises the system for them (or us if, again, we’re feeling generous) / makes the deal sustainable for them.

It’s a trade-off

▲

cmrdporcupine 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They gained that ability to tune settings and then promptly used it in a poor way and degraded customer experience.

▲

szmarczak 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Nothing you wrote makes sense. The limits are so Anthropic isn't on a loss. If they can customize Claude using Code, I see no reason why they couldn't do so with other wrappers. Other wrappers can also make use of cache.

If you worry about "degraded" experience, then let people choose. People won't be using other wrappers if they turn out to be bad. People ain't stupid.

▲

ElFitz 5 hours ago | parent [-]

By imposing the use of their harness, they control the system prompt:

> On April 16, we added a system prompt instruction to reduce verbosity. In combination with other prompt changes, it hurt coding quality, and was reverted on April 20. This impacted Sonnet 4.6, Opus 4.6, and Opus 4.7

They can pick the default reasoning effort:

> On March 4, we changed Claude Code's default reasoning effort from high to medium to reduce the very long latency—enough to make the UI appear frozen—some users were seeing in high mode

They can decide what to keep and what to throw out (beyond simple token caching):

> On March 26, we shipped a change to clear Claude's older thinking from sessions that had been idle for over an hour, to reduce latency when users resumed those sessions. A bug caused this to keep happening every turn for the rest of the session instead of just once, which made Claude seem forgetful and repetitive. We fixed it on April 10. This affected Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.6

It literally is all in the post.

I don't worry about anything though. It's not my product. I don't work for Anthropic, so I really couldn't care less about anyone else's degraded (or not) experience.

	▲	szmarczak 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> they control the system prompt They control the default system prompt. You can change it if you want to. > They can pick the default reasoning effort Don't see how it's an obstacle in allowing third party wrappers. > They can decide what to keep and what to throw out That's actually a good point. However I still don't think it's an obstacle. If third party wrappers were bad, people simply wouldn't be using them.