The meshes look interesting, but the gameplay is very basic. The tank one seems more sophisticated with the flying ships and whatnot.

What's strange is that this Pietro Schirano dude seems to write incredibly cargo cult prompts.

  Game created by Pietro Schirano, CEO of MagicPath

  Prompt: Create a 3D game using three.js. It should be a UFO shooter where I control a tank and shoot down UFOs flying overhead.
  - Think step by step, take a deep breath. Repeat the question back before answering.
  - Imagine you're writing an instruction message for a junior developer who's going to go build this. Can you write something extremely clear and specific for them, including which files they should look at for the change and which ones need to be fixed?
  -Then write all the code. Make the game low-poly but beautiful.
  - Remember, you are an agent: please keep going until the user's query is completely resolved before ending your turn and yielding back to the user. Decompose the user's query into all required sub-requests and confirm that each one is completed. Do not stop after completing only part of the request. Only terminate your turn when you are sure the problem is solved. You must be prepared to answer multiple queries and only finish the call once the user has confirmed they're done.
  - You must plan extensively in accordance with the workflow steps before making subsequent function calls, and reflect extensively on the outcomes of each function call, ensuring the user's query and related sub-requests are completely resolved.

It's weird how people pep talk the AI - if my Jira tickets looked like this, I would throw a fit.

I guess these people think they have special prompt engineering skills, and doing it like this is better than giving the AI a dry list of requirements (fwiw, they might be even right)

Pietro here, I just published a video of it: https://x.com/skirano/status/2047403025094905964?s=20

> Think Step By Step

What is this, 2023?

I feel like this was generated by a model tapping in to 2023 notions of prompt engineering.

It comes across as an elaborate, sparkly motivational cat poster.

*BELIEVE!* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2CRtES2K3E

The prompt did not specify advanced gameplay.

I do not see instructions to assist in task decomposition and agent ~"motivation" to stay aligned over long periods as cargo culting.

See up thread for anecdotes [1].

> Decompose the user's query into all required sub-requests and confirm that each one is completed. Do not stop after completing only part of the request. Only terminate your turn when you are sure the problem is solved.

I see this as a portrayal of the strength of 5.5, since it suggests the ability to be assigned this clearly important role to ~one shot requests like this.

I've been using a cli-ai-first task tool I wrote to process complex "parent" or "umberella" into decomposed subtasks and then execute on them.

This has allowed my workflows to float above the ups and downs of model performance.

That said, having the AI do the planning for a big request like this internally is not good outside a demo.

Because, you want the planning of the AI to be part of the historical context and available for forensics due to stalls, unwound details or other unexpected issues at any point along the way.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47879819

"take a deep breath"

OMFG