…yes? My point is if someone can break the law 547 times and no one is affected then the law is stupid.

Your point is wrong.

The offender may be an exceptionally alert driver who doesn't get into an accident, unlike the average person (and statistics show that higher speed results in a higher accident rate.) You also ignore the claim made by the article that it is not known how many accidents are made by the offender, because the license plate data isn't available. Or the fact that the offender is a cop and we all know how they tend to be treated differently by other cops.

Maybe you want to system where the speed limit is variable and based on some driving aptitude test. What could possibly go wrong with that.