I don’t want the US to win anything ever again. They are a net negative in this world, obsessed with short term profits. Countries like China with long term objectives are better.

▲

rob74 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm a bit sad that the US now look less reliable (and, on average, more of a net negative) than China, but I can't blame anyone who has that impression right now. As long as the guy who sets the long term objectives is reasonably sane, I guess? Putin attacked Ukraine, Trump (and Bibi) attacked Iran, I'm hoping Xi is smarter and doesn't attack Taiwan, otherwise we can all say good bye to our jobs, and who "wins" AI will be the least important question on our minds...

▲

keybored 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It’s all about appearances isn’t it. America has dropped more bombs than China. When did China bomb a country last time? But appearances change and that is sad.

The only thing that changed was that America turned on its client states and started saying unhinged shit instead of appearances-speeches like spreading freedom and democracy.

Edit: replaced “has bombed more countries than China” with “dropped more bombs”

	▲	deadbabe 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		America’s goal is to rule the world through a hegemony built on fear and violence. With the current administration, it’s just that the mask has slipped. Americans are all the same really, it doesn’t matter who voted for who: FIX your shit, fix your society. Stop oppressing the world with destructive capitalism. And yea maybe that means you have to slow down and live a little more inconveniently, but it will be for the betterment of the world.

▲

ozmodiar 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I think China has too much to gain by looking like the word's stable alternative to America. What really gets me depressed is their current trajectory towards cultural homogeneity, even internally. There seems to be a real push to calcify the Han identity. I don't know why dictators are so drawn to homogenizing their own cultures when nature itself seems to point to diversity as strength. It leaves me still kind of hoping America is somehow able to pull its head out of its ass, but they'll have to overcome their own oligarchy and entrenched structures - Trump was a symptom.

▲

throw42356 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

America, China and Russia are all same.

▲

AntiUSAbah 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I don't agree.

China took a very rich business man and told him to stop showing his richness and start doing more for china.

China has a real plan for renewable energy and pushing through it.

China is smarter because it doesn't allow some people to vote for people like Trump and its smarter than russia because it is less motivated by one persons personal agenda.

▲

quater321 3 hours ago | parent [-]

you don't really need to explain that to someone with common sense. If someone says a communist countrie should be the top of the world, they are obviously part of the communist party or simply re*rded.

	▲	defrost 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes. ~ Hacker News Guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
	▲	AntiUSAbah 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I'm clarifying my viewpoint to a comment from someone else to have a proper discussion. It could lead to a good discussion, it often doesn't.

▲

quater321 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

	▲	azangru 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I am puzzled by this sentence, which combines nationality, psychosis, and intelligence into one. What if the parent commenter is Vietnamese? Or Hungarian? Or Turkish? Will this fall into the "or" clause?
	▲	torlok 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Beside posturing, modern China was only involved in skirmishes at the Indian border. What's delusional is blindly comparing China to Russia or the USA.